Readers don't need false information to get the wrong idea. In the online attention economy, UC San Diego research finds that making science more clickable or shareable can help some readers learn more—but leaves many others with an incomplete understanding. The study is published in the journal American Economic Review.
🛡️
Just a quick checkWe’re checking your connection to prevent automated abuse
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | <i>Nature</i>: Scientists Should Have to Register with Governments to Prevent ‘Misinformation’ | 0 | 17.47 | 28-08-2026 |
| 2 | Giving creators their due credit: better practices for publishers, awards, and media | 0 | 10 | 07-08-2026 |
| 3 | Sleep Misinformation Versus the ‘Sleepfluencers’ | 0 | 5 | 02-07-2026 |
| 4 | How online fandom shaped our world | 0 | 10 | 17-08-2026 |
| 5 | New Research on the Effects of AI Disclosure on Perception of News Credibility | 0 | 5.46 | 04-08-2026 |
| 6 | Bounded reasoning and wandering trust: Examining the dynamic effects of science literacy and expert trust against the consequences of conspiracy belief in vaccinations in China | 0 | 5 | 15-07-2026 |
| 7 | The Attribution-Efficacy Paradox: A Scoping Review of GenAI Interaction and Academic Self-Efficacy in Higher Education | 0 | 5 | 16-07-2026 |
| 8 | How rewarding better consumer choices could advance next-gen queueing platforms | 0 | 12.07 | 28-07-2026 |
| 9 | Study reveals Microsoft tactics to lure Windows users | 0 | 5 | 14-07-2026 |