Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Apple must pay Masimo an extra $184M for Apple Watch patent infringement

Дата публикации: 06-10-2026 13:35:41

It’s almost a year since Apple was found to have infringed a Masimo patent for low-power pulse oximeter features used in the Apple Watch.
At the time, the company was ordered to pay $634 million in damages, but a federal judge has now ordered it to pay an additional $184 million in interest …
more…

Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

Apple must pay Masimo an extra $184M for Apple Watch patent infringement | Series 6 with the O2 app open

It’s almost a year since Apple was found to have infringed a Masimo patent for low-power pulse oximeter features used in the Apple Watch.

At the time, the company was ordered to pay $634 million in damages, but a federal judge has now ordered it to pay an additional $184 million in interest …

Apple had been fighting with health tech company Masimo on a couple of fronts. The more serious of them was an International Trade Commission ruling that Apple must remove the blood oxygen feature in two Apple Watch models back in 2023 in order to allow them to be sold in the US. The Cupertino company was forced to redesign the way the feature worked in order to be allowed to bring the devices into the US.

But the company also faced a lawsuit from Masimo, seeking damages for the use of its patented approach to measuring blood oxygen in a power-efficient way. Apple was found to have infringed on this patent and ordered to pay damages amounting to the license fees it should have paid.

Bloomberg Law reports that Apple has now been ordered to pay an additional £184 million in interest on this sum.

Judge James V. Selna rejected Apple’s argument that awarding interest would constitute a windfall for Masimo, citing US Supreme Court guidance that “interest from the time that the royalty payments would have been received merely serves to make the patent owner whole.”

There was some good news for Apple. Masimo had asked for interest calculated at 7%, but the judge rejected this, saying that the interest rate should instead be equivalent to that paid on Massimo’s own borrowing. However, annual compounding still added a total of $184M to the amount due.

Via MacRumors

Add 9to5Mac as a preferred source on Google Add 9to5Mac as a preferred source on Google

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1ITC judge says Apple Watch’s redesigned blood oxygen feature doesn’t infringe Masimo patents07.3419-03-2026
2Apple wins latest round in Masimo fight as ITC closes Apple Watch import ban case011.8518-04-2026
3Apple loses bid to overturn $634 million Masimo patent verdict, new trial also denied014.121-07-2026
4New Apple Watch features may require new legal precedent for privacy010.1215-09-2026
5Apple agrees to reveal India revenue as it faced massive $38B fine0703-06-2026
69to5Mac Daily: August 10, 2026 – Apple Watch rumors, more016.7110-08-2026
7Apple Watch and AirPods health features get major new global expansions09.8421-05-2026
8A sweeping Apple Watch ‘rethink’ could bring new designs and ‘premium models’013.3610-08-2026
9Apple’s $250 million Siri settlement just got approved, here’s who gets paid014.7924-07-2026
109to5Mac Daily: March 20, 2026 – iPhone Fold rumors, Apple Watch patents0320-03-2026

Классификация: Пресс-релизы. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 14.04. Источник: 9to5mac.com.