Вход на сайт

Просмотр новости

Найдите то, что Вас интересует

Inter-agency Coordination

Дата публикации: 23-10-2026 21:07:27



Conventional accounts portray agency design as the outcome of congressional and presidential quests for political control. This perspective aligns with administrative law’s preoccupation with agencies’ external constraints. The main unit of analysis from this point of view is the agency, and the central question is how political principals outside of the agency restrain it. In reality, however, agency actors must also abide by controls internal to the agency: how do these mechanisms arise and what explains their design? For their part, legislative and executive specifications invariably leave organizational slack. Agency heads thus possess substantial discretion to impose internal structures and processes to further their own interests. By and large, however, agency heads have been neglected as important determinants of institutional design. Indeed, like the need for interagency coordination, the bureaucracy requires intra-agency coordination.
This Article seeks to provide a general account of how agency heads, distinct from Congress or the President, manage and operate their organizational divisions. It presents a theory of how administrative leaders use internal hierarchies and procedures to process information in light of their individual preferences and exogenous uncertainties. In doing so, this Article offers a conceptual framework to analyze agency design problems as well as to explain variations in bureaucratic form. Armed with these insights, the analysis then considers some of the resulting normative implications for political and legal oversight. It concludes by suggesting various reforms such as the judicially enforceable disclosure of agencies’ internal rule-drafting processes, as well as doctrines further designed to foster transparency and accountability.



Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.

Publication Date

2026

Publication Title

Public Law & Legal Theory

Abstract

Conventional accounts portray agency design as the outcome of congressional and presidential quests for political control. This perspective aligns with administrative law’s preoccupation with agencies’ external constraints. The main unit of analysis from this point of view is the agency, and the central question is how political principals outside of the agency restrain it. In reality, however, agency actors must also abide by controls internal to the agency: how do these mechanisms arise and what explains their design? For their part, legislative and executive specifications invariably leave organizational slack. Agency heads thus possess substantial discretion to impose internal structures and processes to further their own interests. By and large, however, agency heads have been neglected as important determinants of institutional design. Indeed, like the need for interagency coordination, the bureaucracy requires intra-agency coordination.

This Article seeks to provide a general account of how agency heads, distinct from Congress or the President, manage and operate their organizational divisions. It presents a theory of how administrative leaders use internal hierarchies and procedures to process information in light of their individual preferences and exogenous uncertainties. In doing so, this Article offers a conceptual framework to analyze agency design problems as well as to explain variations in bureaucratic form. Armed with these insights, the analysis then considers some of the resulting normative implications for political and legal oversight. It concludes by suggesting various reforms such as the judicially enforceable disclosure of agencies’ internal rule-drafting processes, as well as doctrines further designed to foster transparency and accountability.

Recommended Citation

Nou, Jennifer, "Inter-agency Coordination" (2026). Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers. .
https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/public_law_and_legal_theory/1003

DOWNLOADS

Since October 23, 2026

COinS

Схожие новости

#Наименование новостиТональностьИнформативностьДата публикации
1Redundant Public-Private Enforcement0723-10-2026
2Patrimonial Constitutionalism06.8619-10-2026
3What Legal Authority Does the Fed Need During a Financial Crisis?08.3723-10-2026
4Why General Law?0419-10-2026
5Cheap Violence: Weapons and the Law05.1619-10-2026
6Looking Ahead: How the US Midterm Outcomes Could Reshape Congressional Investigations Activity01020-10-2026
7The efficiency paradox of majoritarian democracy06.5617-08-2026
8Trump took her to the 'breaking point': Former DOJ prosecutor speaks out08.1621-10-2026
9Legal Mechanisms for Combating Transnational Corruption and Enhancing Economic Resilience in Selected West African Countries07.3418-07-2026
10The long decline of trust in democratic institutions06.0628-07-2026

Классификация: . Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 6.22. Источник: chicagounbound.uchicago.edu.