Просмотр новости
Найдите то, что Вас интересует
Спутники
РН
SpaceX
Роскосмос
NASA
This plus is a minus, except for the battery – Motorola Edge 70 Plus smartphone review
Дата публикации: 01-10-2026 07:08:00
Battery giant, and what else? | Despite its name, the Motorola Edge 70 Plus costs less than the Edge 70, but it also makes some serious compromises in terms of features. Can it secure a place in the upper mid-range, or is the similarly priced competition simply too well-equipped?
Основное содержимое страницы с новостью.
The Motorola Edge 70 Plus has significantly less to offer than the standard Edge 70, but its list price is also lower.
In return, you get a screen that can be very bright when needed, with good color reproduction and a high PWM frequency, giving even sensitive users a better chance of tolerating it well. The build quality is also high, although you can notice some slight compromises compared with the more expensive models, such as the lack of protection against immersion in water.
The main camera takes good photos, but is rather isolated on the back, so zoom capabilities are limited.
The large battery is certainly a highlight. It enables very good battery life, and the Edge 70 Plus does indeed have a clear advantage over the Edge 70 here.
Competition is fierce in the €600 range: high-quality midrange smartphones from Oppo or Samsung sometimes offer significantly more power or have a more flexible camera system.
Pros
+ very long battery life
+ bright, color-accurate AMOLED display
+ high-quality, clean workmanship
+ good main camera in low light
+ fast, reliable fingerprint sensor
+ storage expandable via microSD
+ updates until 2031
Cons
- the competition is sometimes more powerful
- limited camera system without zoom
- no protection against submersion
- comparatively slow Wi-Fi
- security patches are not fully up to date
At the time of testing, the smartphone is only available in Europa and the Middle East for around US$ 680.
- $393.30
Motorola Moto Edge 70 Fusion 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (256GB+8GB) NFC 50MP 4K Triple Cam Dual Sim 6.8" Curved XT2605-3 Latino American Version (Pantone Silhouette (Blue))
- $489.50
Motorola Moto Edge 70 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB+12GB) NFC 50MP 4K Triple Cam Dual Sim 6.67" Curved XT2601-3 Latino American Version (Gadget Gray)
- $559.50
Motorola Moto Edge 70 5G Ai (Compatible with Tmobile Mint Tello & Global) (512GB+12GB) NFC 50MP 4K Triple Cam Dual Sim 6.67" Curved XT2601-3 Latino American Version (Bronze Green)
Table of Contents
- Verdict on the Motorola Edge 70 Plus
- Specifications
- Case and features – Acetate finish on the Motorola phone
- Communication and operation – Mid-range with fingerprint sensor
- Software and sustainability – Motorola promises updates through 2031
- Cameras – Just a single cam
- Display – Motorola phone with a great AMOLED display
- Performance, emissions and battery life – A purchase recommendation thanks to its battery life
- Notebookcheck overall rating
- Possible alternatives compared
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 8c/8t, 1 x 2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 3 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A720, 4 x 1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A520, Cortex-A720 / A520
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB
Display
6.78 inch 19.6:9, 2772 x 1272 pixel 450 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 1500 Hz sampling rate, Gorilla Glass 7i, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB
, 203 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (up to 1 TB), NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: gyroscope, compass, acceleration
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 6.0, GSM (850/ 900/ 1800/ 1900 MHz), UMTS (Band 1/ 2/ 4/ 5/ 6/ 8/ 19), LTE (Band 1/ 2/ 3/ 4/ 5/ 7/ 8/ 12/ 17/ 18/ 18/ 29/ 26/ 28/ 38/ 40/ 41/ 42/ 48/ 66), 5G /Band 1/ 2/ 3/ 5/ 7/ 8/ 12/ 29/ 28/ 38/ 40/ 41/ 48/ 66/ 77/ 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 162.7 x 75.7 ( = 0.33 x 6.41 x 2.98 in)
Battery
6500 mAh Lithium-Ion, 45 Watt wired charging, 7.5 Watt wired reverse charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 200 MPix f/1.8, Phasenvergleich-AF, OIS, LED-Blitz (Kamera 1); 2.0MP, f/2.4, Makroobjektiv (Kamera 2)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.2
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), USB cable, silicone bumper, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP64 certified, MIL-STD-810H, fanless
Weight
159 g ( = 5.61 oz / 0.35 pounds)
Price
599 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Motorola's mid-range smartphone comes with an acetate finish on the back. As is often the case with the manufacturer, it comes in three different Pantone colors: Mountain View, Grey Lilac, and Milky Blue—that is, dark green, pearlescent, and light blue. A light green variant can also be seen in promotional images, but is currently unavailable, at least in Europe.
The smooth finish looks premium, and the Edge 70 Plus is well built. However, we can produce a noticeable creaking sound when twisting it. The edges of the back are rounded, so the Edge 70 Plus feels quite different from the series' more angular siblings.
The phone is currently available only with 256 GB of storage and 8 GB of RAM. A 128 GB version is also being produced, however. There is a microSD card reader, which can be used to expand the storage. It performs reasonably well in our tests.
Motorola Edge 70 Plus Samsung Galaxy A57 Oppo Reno16 FS Honor 600 Sony Xperia 10 VIII DIN A6 ❌
162.7 mm / 6.41 in 75.7 mm / 2.98 in 8.5 mm / 0.3346 in 159 g0.3505 lbs161.5 mm / 6.36 in 76.8 mm / 3.02 in 6.9 mm / 0.2717 in 179 g0.3946 lbs158.2 mm / 6.23 in 74.9 mm / 2.95 in 8.6 mm / 0.3386 in 196 g0.4321 lbs156 mm / 6.14 in 74.7 mm / 2.94 in 7.8 mm / 0.3071 in 185 g0.4079 lbs153 mm / 6.02 in 72 mm / 2.83 in 8.3 mm / 0.3268 in 168 g0.3704 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs
WiFi 6 is built in as the fastest Wi-Fi standard, and the Motorola phone achieves speeds of up to 532 Mbps in our test with the Asus RT-BE96U reference router. Other phones in this price range can be significantly faster, but these speeds are usually sufficient for everyday use.
There is a good selection of 4G and 5G frequencies for mobile networks, so you can also use the smartphone when traveling. Reception is decent in spot checks during our test, even in places with poor network coverage.
The touchscreen is easy to use, although it has rounded corners, so whether you like that is a matter of taste.
The fingerprint sensor is integrated into the display and unlocks the phone very quickly and reliably after a single enrollment. Face unlock is also available, but only using the 2D method.
| Networking | |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 425 (min: 313) MBit/s ∼23% |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 513 (min: 498) MBit/s ∼29% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Wi-Fi 6E | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 1853 (min: 1699) MBit/s ∼100% |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 1842 (min: 807) MBit/s ∼99% |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 1570 (min: 1492) MBit/s ∼88% |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 1531 (min: 1366) MBit/s ∼85% |
| Oppo Reno16 FS 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 324 (min: 206) MBit/s ∼17% |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 397 (min: 325) MBit/s ∼22% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Wi-Fi 6E | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | 994 (min: 958) MBit/s ∼79% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | 919 (min: 778) MBit/s ∼65% |
| Honor 600 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | 1776 (min: 863) MBit/s ∼100% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | 1102 (min: 187) MBit/s ∼100% |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | 823 (min: 214) MBit/s ∼46% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | 825 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼75% |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | 1161 (min: 417) MBit/s ∼92% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | 1230 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼87% |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 479 (min: 324) MBit/s ∼26% |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 492 (min: 395) MBit/s ∼27% |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | 656 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼37% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | 687 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼62% |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | 1258 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼100% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | 1413 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼100% |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 1643 (min: 316) MBit/s ∼89% |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 1792 (min: 328) MBit/s ∼100% |
Motorola comes with Android 16 preinstalled, and the security patches were from August 2026 at the time of testing, so they are no longer fully up to date. The manufacturer promises 5 years of security patches, i.e. until 2031, and 3 OS updates.
There is little information on sustainability, but at least the packaging is plastic-free.
Front camera recordingWhen it comes to cameras, the Motorola Edge 70 Plus takes a different approach: Instead of focusing on powerful zoom lenses and wide-angle cameras, the manufacturer relies entirely on the main camera and pairs it with only a very low-resolution macro camera.
The main camera, however, has a resolution of 200 megapixels and actually takes good-looking photos with fine detail. The sensor also delivers impressive performance in low light.
The front camera takes very nice selfies, although they tend to be overexposed in very bright areas.
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
click to load images
7.3 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
12 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
11 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
38.1 ∆E
30.1 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
28 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
The Edge 70 Plus offers a very bright AMOLED screen, which typically reaches around 1,400 cd/m² at maximum in everyday use, but can exceed 4,000 cd/m² with smaller areas and HDR content. Color reproduction impresses with minimal deviations from the ideal, at least when you select the “Natural” color profile.
At 361 Hz, the PWM flicker frequency is very high; nevertheless, sensitive users should try out the screen before buying, for example at an electronics store.
| 1414 cd/m² | ||||
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1414 cd/m² (Nits) Minimum: 2.9 cd/m²
Center on Battery: 1414 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.24 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
103.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.129
CCT: 6517 K
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus AMOLED, 2772x1272, 6.8" | Sony Xperia 10 VIII OLED, 2340x1080, 6.1" | Oppo Reno16 FS AMOLED, 2372x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy A57 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Honor 600 AMOLED, 2728x1264, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -65% | -68% | -54% | 35% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 4226 | 1487 -65% | 1306 -69% | 1920 -55% | 3102 -27% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 4152 | 1470 -65% | 1359 -67% | 1980 -52% | 8192 97% |
| Response Times | 1% | -41% | -19% | -4% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.2 ?(0.6, 0.6) | 0.93 ?(0.435, 0.496) 22% | 1.7 ?(0.9, 0.8) -42% | 1.21 ?(0.59, 0.622) -1% | 1.06 ?(0.3275, 0.733) 12% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.8 ?(0.4, 0.4) | 0.93 ?(0.493, 0.4355) -16% | 1.4 ?(0.7, 0.7) -75% | 1.1 ?(0.543, 0.5595) -38% | 1 ?(0.46, 0.535) -25% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 361 | 480 | 92 | 240 | 60 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 14 | 14.46 -3% | 15 -7% | 16.72 -19% | 13.86 1% |
| Screen | -12% | -101% | -11% | -62% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1414 | 1522 8% | 1143 -19% | 1135 -20% | 1787 26% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.24 | 1.4 -13% | 3.27 -164% | 1.7 -37% | 1.9 -53% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.29 | 2.9 -27% | 6.49 -183% | 2.5 -9% | 5.3 -131% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 2.1 -17% | 2.5 -39% | 1.4 22% | 3.4 -89% |
| Gamma | 2.129 103% | 2.23 99% | 2.274 97% | 2.08 106% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6517 100% | 6832 95% | 6850 95% | 6578 99% | 6874 95% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1527 | 1134 | |||
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 97 | 99 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -25% / -20% | -70% / -74% | -28% / -23% | -10% / -21% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 361 Hz Amplitude: 14 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 361 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 361 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7611 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Measurement series at a fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness may look flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows an enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness.)
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms). | ||
The performance of the SoC, a Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, is somewhat below what you would expect at this price point. Smooth operation is usually possible as long as you don't use overly demanding apps or multitask. There is some performance headroom, but very demanding apps overwhelm the smartphone.
Noticeable surface warming can be felt on the chassis after prolonged heavy use. Fortunately, this has no impact on the SoC's performance, as the 3DMark stress tests show.
The stereo speakers produce decent sound and can get loud enough to fill a medium-sized room. Even better sound quality is available through headphones or external speakers, which can be connected via USB or Bluetooth. The phone supports numerous audio codecs for Bluetooth.
The 6,500-mAh battery rounds out the phone. It delivers excellent battery life and far outlasts the Edge 70: we measured 23:42 hours in our Wi-Fi test, which should be enough for two days of average use. The phone supports charging at up to 45 watts, and the battery takes no more than 2 hours to fully recharge. External devices can also be powered from the phone's battery via cable at up to 7.5 watts.
| Geekbench 7.0 | |
| Single-Core | |
| Average of class Smartphone (514 - 4055, n=40, last 2 years) | 1585 Points +109% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 1222 Points +61% |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 1145 Points +51% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (758 - 1040, n=2) | 899 Points +19% |
| Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 874 Points +15% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 854 Points +13% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192 | 758 Points |
| Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1368 - 11622, n=40, last 2 years) | 5504 Points +124% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 4470 Points +82% |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 3957 Points +61% |
| Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 2989 Points +22% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 2974 Points +21% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (2459 - 3433, n=2) | 2946 Points +20% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192 | 2459 Points |
| Geekbench 6.7 | |
| Single-Core | |
| Average of class Smartphone (196 - 4733, n=190, last 2 years) | 1875 Points |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 1378 Points |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 1317 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (1158 - 1188, n=9) | 1171 Points |
| Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 1005 Points |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 957 Points |
| Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Smartphone (830 - 12854, n=190, last 2 years) | 5692 Points |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 4509 Points |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 4051 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (3232 - 3426, n=9) | 3311 Points |
| Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 2872 Points |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 2853 Points |
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Score | |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 7468 Points |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 5937 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (3981 - 4376, n=9) | 4168 Points |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 3290 Points |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 3289 Points |
| Average of class Smartphone (270 - 7687, n=87, last 2 years) | 3010 Points |
| Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (271 - 39243, n=175, last 2 years) | 12769 Points +188% |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 7561 Points +70% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 6154 Points +39% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192 | 4437 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4131 - 4457, n=10) | 4249 Points -4% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 3318 Points -25% |
| Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 3149 Points -29% |
| Wild Life Extreme | |
| Average of class Smartphone (61 - 9329, n=178, last 2 years) | 3337 Points +192% |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 2064 Points +81% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 1721 Points +51% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192 | 1143 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (1054 - 1148, n=10) | 1094 Points -4% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 867 Points -24% |
| Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 855 Points -25% |
| Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Average of class Smartphone (62 - 10023, n=174, last 2 years) | 3334 Points +198% |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 2043 Points +83% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 1718 Points +54% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192 | 1118 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (1039 - 1130, n=10) | 1085 Points -3% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 859 Points -23% |
| Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 849 Points -24% |
| Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (132 - 4198, n=130, last 2 years) | 1545 Points |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 772 Points |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 761 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (359 - 413, n=6) | 385 Points |
| Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 351 Points |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 305 Points |
| Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (132 - 4207, n=129, last 2 years) | 1532 Points |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 784 Points |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 761 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (354 - 417, n=6) | 387 Points |
| Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 351 Points |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 307 Points |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 185, n=185, last 2 years) | 61.9 fps +88% |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 60 fps +82% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 57 fps +73% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (18 - 47, n=10) | 36.6 fps +11% |
| Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 35 fps +6% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192 | 33 fps |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 31 fps -6% |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 378, n=184, last 2 years) | 130 fps +165% |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 96 fps +96% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 72 fps +47% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192 | 49 fps |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (36 - 55, n=10) | 47.7 fps -3% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 42 fps -14% |
| Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 39 fps -20% |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 154, n=186, last 2 years) | 50.5 fps +166% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 43 fps +126% |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 39 fps +105% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (12 - 29, n=10) | 22.4 fps +18% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 21 fps +11% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192 | 19 fps |
| Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 6.2 fps -67% |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 151, n=184, last 2 years) | 51 fps +530% |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 36 fps +344% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 34 fps +320% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (8.1 - 21, n=10) | 17.3 fps +114% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 15 fps +85% |
| Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 14 fps +73% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192 | 8.1 fps |
| 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.54 - 72, n=184, last 2 years) | 23.4 fps +189% |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 16 fps +98% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 14 fps +73% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (5.9 - 9.1, n=10) | 8.13 fps 0% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192 | 8.1 fps |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 6.5 fps -20% |
| Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 6.2 fps -23% |
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision NPU 1.7 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (80 - 7066, n=134, last 2 years) | 543 Points +162% |
| Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 538 Points +160% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 284 Points +37% |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 273 Points +32% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (207 - 241, n=6) | 231 Points +12% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192 | 207 Points |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 138 Points -33% |
| Half Precision NPU 1.7 | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 1998 Points +986% |
| Average of class Smartphone (80 - 35139, n=134, last 2 years) | 1450 Points +688% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 284 Points +54% |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 275 Points +49% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (184 - 244, n=6) | 228 Points +24% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192 | 184 Points |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 138 Points -25% |
| Quantized NPU 1.7 | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 5181 Points +1113% |
| Average of class Smartphone (124 - 48271, n=134, last 2 years) | 2216 Points +419% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 637 Points +49% |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 633 Points +48% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (427 - 548, n=6) | 527 Points +23% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192 | 427 Points |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 389 Points -9% |
| CrossMark | |
| Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (376 - 2856, n=107, last 2 years) | 1261 Points +120% |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 1095 Points +91% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 851 Points +49% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (573 - 809, n=9) | 733 Points +28% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192 | 573 Points |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | Points -100% |
| Productivity | |
| Average of class Smartphone (388 - 2366, n=107, last 2 years) | 1135 Points +88% |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 936 Points +55% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 892 Points +48% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (603 - 867, n=9) | 783 Points +30% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192 | 603 Points |
| Creativity | |
| Average of class Smartphone (310 - 2123, n=107, last 2 years) | 1028 Points +97% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 826 Points +58% |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 793 Points +52% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (523 - 701, n=9) | 657 Points +26% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192 | 523 Points |
| Responsiveness | |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 4605 Points +615% |
| Average of class Smartphone (466 - 13407, n=107, last 2 years) | 3970 Points +516% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (644 - 1021, n=9) | 822 Points +28% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 811 Points +26% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192 | 644 Points |
| Jetstream 2 | |
| 2.0 Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 178.3 Points +44% |
| Average of class Smartphone (63.9 - 423, n=117, last 2 years) | 157.1 Points +27% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (118 - 161.6, n=6) | 140.4 Points +13% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192 | 123.851 Points |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 109.02 Points -12% |
| 2.2 Total | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=104, last 2 years) | 204 Points +15% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 203.905 Points +15% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 8192 | 177.287 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (160.6 - 177.3, n=5) | 168.4 Points -5% |
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 8192 | 147.651 Points -17% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 140.531 Points -21% |
| Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192 | 137.841 Points -22% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus | Sony Xperia 10 VIII | Oppo Reno16 FS | Samsung Galaxy A57 | Honor 600 | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -8% | -8% | -39% | -1% | -23% | -3% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 2048.02 | 1914.56 -7% | 1902.3 -7% | 1683.07 -18% | 1986.99 -3% | 1775 ?(950 - 3497, n=127) -13% | 2278 ?(270 - 4370, n=181, last 2 years) 11% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1844.13 | 1802.32 -2% | 1795.4 -3% | 1119.11 -39% | 1807.77 -2% | 1247 ?(166.8 - 2674, n=127) -32% | 1971 ?(152.2 - 4113, n=181, last 2 years) 7% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 364.54 | 320.27 -12% | 306 -16% | 249.83 -31% | 353.95 -3% | 290 ?(173.5 - 543, n=127) -20% | 317 ?(47.6 - 614, n=181, last 2 years) -13% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 434.49 | 386.88 -11% | 402.6 -7% | 149.04 -66% | 451 4% | 319 ?(62.6 - 548, n=128) -27% | 362 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=181, last 2 years) -17% |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 45.1 °C = 113 F Average: 43.5 °C = 110 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 44.3 °C = 112 F Average: 42.2 °C = 108 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) 41.9 °C = 107 F | Room Temperature 20.9 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 99.2 % +2% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 97.4 % |
| Honor 600 Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 95.2 % -2% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 90.3 % -7% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 80.1 % -18% |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Oppo Reno16 FS Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 99.5 % +2% |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 97.7 % |
| Honor 600 Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 95.3 % -2% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 93.4 % -4% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 75.7 % -23% |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Honor 600 Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 99.4 % |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 99.2 % |
| Oppo Reno16 FS Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 96.7 % |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 86 % |
dB(A)
0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202.838.4256.526.53110.325.24014.1305017.731.66320.530.68019.132.610013.733.812512.637.316014.14120020.645.225021.249.53152253.140022.456.950022.761.463021.463.580018.267.7100016.666.7125018.370.9160018.669.8200017.563.9250014.663315013.663400013.270.8500013.673.9630014.375.4800014.872.91000015.267.91250016701600016.654.8SPL29.482.1N146.9median 16.6median 63.5Delta3.3921.224.720.423.424.921.434.729.336.332.920.121.914.13014.535.61641.816.757.315.657.514.756.812.562.69.259.69.966.410.473.81376.812.374.910.577.411.377.311.88212.380.813.37913.574.712.974.513.371.113.167.313.370.213.564.813.261.324.689.10.674.9median 13.1median 71.11.28.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Edge 70 PlusSamsung Galaxy A57
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Edge 70 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Samsung Galaxy A57 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Power Consumption
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus 6500 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 VIII 5000 mAh | Oppo Reno16 FS 6500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A57 5000 mAh | Honor 600 6400 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -23% | 16% | 1% | -30% | -10% | 9% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.9 | 0.81 10% | 0.9 -0% | 0.71 21% | 1.24 -38% | 1.245 ?(0.67 - 3.5, n=8) -38% | 0.901 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=137, last 2 years) -0% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.6 | 2.51 -57% | 1.2 25% | 1.94 -21% | 2.28 -42% | 1.659 ?(0.94 - 3.7, n=8) -4% | 1.483 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=137, last 2 years) 7% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2.1 | 2.57 -22% | 1.6 24% | 2.04 3% | 2.3 -10% | 1.861 ?(1 - 4.1, n=8) 11% | 1.677 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=137, last 2 years) 20% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 4.37 | 6.19 | 4.43 ?(3.29 - 7.5, n=6) | ||||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 10.16 | 13.67 | 7.57 ?(4.75 - 12.7, n=6) |
* ... smaller is better
Battery Runtime
| Idle (without WLAN, min brightness) | 40h 33min | |
| WiFi Websurfing | 23h 42min | |
| Load (maximum brightness) | 5h 29min |
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus 6500 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 VIII 5000 mAh | Oppo Reno16 FS 6500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A57 5000 mAh | Honor 600 6400 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -16% | -3% | -25% | -5% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 40.6 | 40.1 -1% | 39.8 -2% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 23.7 | 19.8 -16% | 23.4 -1% | 14.9 -37% | 22.6 -5% |
| Load (h) | 5.5 | 5.1 -7% | 3.6 -35% | ||
| H.264 (h) | 26.8 |
The Motorola Edge 70 Plus impresses mainly with its battery life.
Otherwise, it is often somewhat lacking in features, for example when it comes to the processor and camera.
Review: Motorola Edge 70 Plus. Review unit provided by Motorola Germany.
Motorola Edge 70 Plus
- 10/01/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Chassis
85%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
44 / 69 → 63%
Weight
93 / 50-100 → 86%
Battery
93%
Display
92%
Games Performance
15 / 55 → 27%
Application Performance
58 / 85 → 69%
AI Performance
13%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
63%
Average
62%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
10%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
94.6%
Repairability
9%
Software Updates
73.3%
Total Sustainability Score: 46.2%
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 77.8%
| Motorola Edge 70 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 599€ | 159 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.78" 2772x1272 450 PPI AMOLED |
2. 78.5%
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 599€ | 168 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.10" 2340x1080 422 PPI OLED |
3. 76%
| Oppo Reno16 FS MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 649€ | 196 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.57" 2372x1080 397 PPI AMOLED |
4. 81.5%
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 550 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 589€ | 179 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED |
5. 82.8%
| Honor 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 722 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1 | Amazon: $729.00 List Price: 650€ | 185 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.57" 2728x1264 458 PPI AMOLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
More articles related to this deviceRelated Articles
Motorola Edge 70 Plus (Edge 70 Series)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Editor of the original article: Florian Schmitt - Managing Editor Mobile - 1675 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2009
I initially wrote about gaming laptops when I joined Notebookcheck in 2009. I was then involved with the setup of the comparison portal Notebookinfo and worked with social media concepts for large companies like BMW and Adidas, while also returning to work for Notebookcheck in 2012. Nowadays, I focus on smartphones, tablets, and future technologies. Since 2018 I have been Managing Editor for mobile device reviews, working alongside my colleague Daniel Schmidt.
Florian Schmitt, 2026-10- 1 (Update: 2026-10- 1)
Схожие новости
Классификация: Пресс-релизы. Схожих патентов: 0. Схожих новостей: 10. Тональность: 0. Информативность: 11.49. Источник: www.notebookcheck.net.