Costly downtime. | The Sony Xperia 10 VIII stays true to its lineage: compact, lightweight, and featuring extras that have become rare, such as a headphone jack and microSD slot. While little else has changed technically, the most noticeable new feature is its brighter display. In this review, we determine whether this justifies the significant price increase compared to its predecessor.
The Sony Xperia 10 VIII stands out with its bright OLED display, good battery life, precise location tracking, and rare extras like a headphone jack and microSD slot. The smartphone's build quality, light weight, and compact design are also appealing.
However, the high price is offset by a slow Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 processor, only 128 GB of storage, USB 2.0, and unchanged cameras from the previous generation.
The lack of HDR support and occasional stuttering also detract from the overall impression. That being said, compared to the Xperia 10 VII, the significantly brighter display in particular stands out as a real improvement.
Other new features are relatively minor. Given the substantial price increase, Sony offers too little added value overall compared to its predecessor.
+ bright display
+ microSD and audio jack
+ water- and dust-resistant
+ good battery life
- No HDR support
- USB 2.0 only
- Slow SoC
The Sony Xperia 10 VIII has a manufacturer’s suggested retail price of €599 and can be purchased directly from Sony DE and Sony UK (£549).
The smartphone is also available on Amazon DE, among other retailers.
Sony Xperia 1 VII XQ-FS72 512GB 12GB Dual SIM Factory Unlocked GSM Smartphone, 5G 6.5" 120Hz OLED Display, 48MP Camera - International Version (Orchid Purple)
Google Pixel 10a - 30+ Hours Battery, Camera Coach, Gemini - Obsidian 128GB
Sony Xperia 10 V XQ-DC72 5G Dual 128GB ROM 8GB RAM Factory Unlocked (GSM Only | No CDMA - not Compatible with Verizon/Sprint) NGP Wireless Charger Included, Global Mobile Cell Phone - Black
With the Xperia 10 VIII, Sony is focusing on evolution rather than a fresh start. Compared to the Xperia 10 VII, much remains unchanged: the manufacturer has retained the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 SoC, 5,000-mAh battery, 128 GB of storage, and the basic camera features.
The most noteworthy addition this time is the significantly brighter 120-Hz OLED display, along with minor adjustments to the hardware and software.
At the same time, the MSRP has increased from €449 to €599. Whether these few improvements justify this substantial price increase remains to be seen in our following review of the Xperia 10 VIII.
Processor
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB
, LPDDR5
Display
6.10 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 422 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Refresh rate: 60 - 120 Hz, Scratch resistance on Mohs hardness scale: 5; Screen-body-ratio: 83 %, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB
, 100 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 153 x 72 ( = 0.33 x 6.02 x 2.83 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Battery charge time: 50 %: 32 min, 80 %: 59 min, 100 %: 69 min; Battery charge cycles: 1400
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.9, 1/1.56", 24 mm) + 13 MPix (f/2.4, 1/3", 16 mm); Camera2-API-Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0, 1/4", 26 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Virtual keyboard, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC (cannot be viewed) | GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C), Galileo (E1), QZSS (L1) | HDR: not supported | DRM Widevine L1 | IP65, IP68 | USB Copy Test: 26.24 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT | Body-SAR: 0.81 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.6 W/kg | max. charging speed: 22 W (wired)
Biometric security: capacitive fingerprint | Vibration motor: ERM | Telephony features: Single-Nano-SIM, Single-eSIM, Wi-Fi Calling, VoLTE
Update Policy: 4 years Android-Updates (till 08/2030), 6 years security patches (till 08/2032), fanless, waterproof
Released
08/25/2026
Weight
168 g ( = 5.93 oz / 0.37 pounds)
Price
599 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
The Sony Xperia 10 VIII is one of the more compact smartphones, but it’s a bit on the thicker side at 8.3 mm. We measured 8.5 mm at the outer edges, and up to 10.1 mm including the camera. Weighing 168 g, it’s relatively light and fits comfortably in the hand.
With its rather thick screen bezels, the Sony smartphone looks a bit dated. On the other hand, the display isn’t interrupted by a camera, and the two speakers face forward. The build quality impresses in our test with even and tight gaps. During torsion tests, the Xperia 10 Mk 8 remains rigid and silent.
The phone is both dust- and water-resistant according to IP65/IP68 standards. Access to the SIM card and microSD slot is also tool-free.
The Xperia 10 VIII is available in Misty Lilac, Matte Gray, and Frozen White color options.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Samsung Galaxy A57 Google Pixel 10a Sony Xperia 10 VIII Sony Xperia 10 VII DIN A6 ❌
163.44 mm / 6.43 in 78.27 mm / 3.08 in 8.65 mm / 0.3406 in 225 g0.496 lbs163.6 mm / 6.44 in 76.6 mm / 3.02 in 7.9 mm / 0.311 in 210 g0.463 lbs161.5 mm / 6.36 in 76.8 mm / 3.02 in 6.9 mm / 0.2717 in 179 g0.3946 lbs153.9 mm / 6.06 in 73 mm / 2.87 in 9 mm / 0.3543 in 183 g0.4034 lbs153 mm / 6.02 in 72 mm / 2.83 in 8.3 mm / 0.3268 in 168 g0.3704 lbs153 mm / 6.02 in 72 mm / 2.83 in 8.3 mm / 0.3268 in 168 g0.3704 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs
The Sony Xperia 10 VIII is once again available only with 128 GB of storage, though this can still be expanded using a microSD card. Another rarity is the built-in headphone jack. But that’s about it for the special features.
For a €600 smartphone, USB 2.0 feels rather meager. Additionally, connected storage devices formatted with NTFS cannot be read. Bluetooth 5.4 and NFC are also on board.
Although the microSD card reader is slightly faster in testing than its predecessor, it still isn’t exactly setting the world on fire. On the plus side, the card can be swapped out without any additional tools.
Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø35.8 (22.4-48.6) MB/s
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø35.8 (27.7-48.7) MB/s
Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø68.6 (15-80.2) MB/s
Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø70.9 (15.8-78.7) MB/s
The Sony Xperia 10 VIII ships with Google Android 16 and receives four years of version updates as well as two additional years of security patches.
Sony preinstalls a few of its own apps but is sparing with third-party apps. Only Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn come preinstalled.
However, these apps cannot be completely uninstalled but only disabled.
Sony remains rather vague regarding the Xperia 10 VIII when it comes to sustainability aspects. The housing contains recycled plastic, but the manufacturer does not specify the exact percentage of recycled material.
The packaging consists of paper and Sony’s original blended material made from bamboo, sugarcane fibers, and recycled paper. Sony also does not provide a product-specific carbon footprint.
Sony does not offer a self-repair program for the Xperia 10 VIII. For hardware defects, the manufacturer refers users to its repair service and authorized service centers.
Sony isn’t exactly generous when it comes to supporting a wide range of mobile frequencies, and this applies to both 4G and 5G. Within Europe, however, this isn’t a problem; it’s only during intercontinental travel that one or two bands may be missing.
Although Wi-Fi 7 isn’t built in, at least 6 GHz Wi-Fi is supported. In testing, this not only delivers high data transfer rates but also ensures stable performance.
| Networking | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Wi-Fi 6E | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 1853 (min: 1699) MBit/s ∼100% |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 1842 (min: 807) MBit/s ∼99% |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 1570 (min: 1492) MBit/s ∼91% |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 1531 (min: 1366) MBit/s ∼89% |
| Google Pixel 10a Wi-Fi 6E | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 853 (min: 681) MBit/s ∼46% |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 743 (min: 711) MBit/s ∼43% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Wi-Fi 6E | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | 994 (min: 958) MBit/s ∼55% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | 919 (min: 778) MBit/s ∼59% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 510 (min: 479) MBit/s ∼28% |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 442 (min: 236) MBit/s ∼26% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Wi-Fi 6E | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | 1777 (min: 1708) MBit/s ∼98% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | 1567 (min: 1519) MBit/s ∼100% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Wi-Fi 6E | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | 920 (min: 620) MBit/s ∼96% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | 837 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼89% |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | 1814 (min: 872) MBit/s ∼100% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | 1547 (min: 1408) MBit/s ∼99% |
| Average Wi-Fi 6E | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | 954 (min: 227) MBit/s ∼100% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | 940 (min: 442) MBit/s ∼100% |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | 1371 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼76% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | 1335 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼85% |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 1484 (min: 853) MBit/s ∼80% |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 1411 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼82% |
| Average of class Smartphone | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | 656 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼69% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | 687 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼73% |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | 1258 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼69% |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | 1413 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼90% |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 1576 (min: 316) MBit/s ∼85% |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | 1722 (min: 328) MBit/s ∼100% |
Samsung Galaxy A57 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø994 (958-1015) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A57 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø919 (778-943) MBit/s
Sony Xperia 10 VIII Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21, 6 GHz: Ø1853 (1699-1926) MBit/s
Sony Xperia 10 VIII Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21, 5 GHz: Ø1842 (807-1925) MBit/s
Sony Xperia 10 VIII Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21, 5 GHz: Ø1570 (1492-1624) MBit/s
Sony Xperia 10 VIII Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.21, 6 GHz: Ø1531 (1366-1627) MBit/s
The Xperia 10 VIII's satfix is fast and accurate outdoors, even though the smartphone only supports single-band GNSS. It doesn’t take much longer indoors, but it is significantly less precise and also fluctuates considerably.
On a bike ride, we compare the smartphone’s positioning capabilities with those of a Garmin Venu 2. The two devices largely agree on the recorded total distance, differing by only 10 m.
While the smartwatch tracks the distance traveled more accurately by the lake, the Xperia phone is more precise in the city center.
The call quality of the Sony Xperia 10 VIII felt quite natural when held to the ear, though the suppression of background noise could be better.
Only a nano-SIM card and/or an eSIM can be used.
As for the cameras, everything remains the same — they’re identical to those on the Xperia 10 VII. Despite the small front-facing sensor, it takes pretty good selfies in daylight. However, the camera only records video in HD or full HD at 30 fps.
The main rear sensor is complemented by an ultra-wide-angle lens. The former features natural white balance and could benefit from a bit more dynamic range, depending on the subject.
In low light, the camera still produces decent shots, though these require a long exposure time. The ultra-wide-angle lens offers a balanced overall composition, but the image becomes slightly blurry at the edges. Zooming is exclusively digital, and the maximum magnification possible is 6x.
The main camera records videos in ultra HD (30 fps) at best. However, this resolution — as well as full HD at 60 fps — is only available to the main sensor.
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x zoomLow light

click to load images

6.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6.1 ∆E

28.2 ∆E
47.8 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
54.9 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
26.1 ∆E
56.3 ∆E
57.7 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
63.1 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
58.4 ∆E
61 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
Sony does not include any accessories in the package.
The warranty in Germany is valid for 24 months.
The Sony Xperia 10 VIII’s capacitive touchscreen works flawlessly and has good glide characteristics.
The fingerprint sensor is located in the power button and also works reliably in most cases. Sony has once again opted not to include additional facial recognition.
For the vibration motor, Sony continues to rely on an affordable ERM motor. While it’s powerful, it’s also feels a bit vague.
The dedicated shutter button can be used both to take screenshots and to launch the camera app. In the camera app, it serves as the shutter button.
The display on the Xperia 10 VIII is virtually unchanged from the previous generation; Sony has merely increased the brightness by about 50%, which our measurements also confirm.
Users who adjust the brightness manually can achieve up to 682 cd/m².
It’s a shame, however, that there’s no HDR support and the PWM frequency, at 480 Hz, isn’t particularly high. This means that PWM-sensitive users may experience discomfort.
| 1512 cd/m² | 1519 cd/m² | 1550 cd/m² | ||
| 1513 cd/m² | 1522 cd/m² | 1542 cd/m² | ||
| 1508 cd/m² | 1527 cd/m² | 1551 cd/m² | ||
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1551 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1527.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.95 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1522 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
95.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
CCT: 6832 K
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII OLED, 2340x1080, 6.1" | Google Pixel 10a pOLED, 2424x1080, 6.3" | Samsung Galaxy A57 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G 2772x1280, 6.8" | Nothing Phone (4a) Pro AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.8" | Sony Xperia 10 VII OLED, 2340x1080, 6.1" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 102% | 32% | 109% | 7% | -28% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1487 | 3050 105% | 1920 29% | 3493 135% | 1596 7% | 1073 -28% |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1470 | 2925 99% | 1980 35% | 2695 83% | 1564 6% | 1074 -27% |
| Response Times | -23% | -21% | -11% | 16% | -17% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.93 ?(0.435, 0.496) | 1.42 ?(0.562, 0.859) -53% | 1.21 ?(0.59, 0.622) -30% | 1.18 ?(0.661, 0.5205) -27% | 0.64 ?(0.307, 0.3305) 31% | 1.051 ?(0.5025, 0.5485) -13% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.93 ?(0.493, 0.4355) | 1.07 ?(0.556, 0.51) -15% | 1.1 ?(0.543, 0.5595) -18% | 0.99 ?(0.617, 0.375) -6% | 0.84 ?(0.418, 0.4175) 10% | 1.26 ?(0.6745, 0.5815) -35% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 480 | 240 | 240 | 120 | 90 | 480 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 14.46 | 14.71 -2% | 16.72 -16% | 14.56 -1% | 13.58 6% | 15.04 -4% |
| Screen | 23% | -4% | -14% | -19% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 1522 | 2205 45% | 1135 -25% | 1124 -26% | 1604 5% | 820 -46% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 1527 | 1134 -26% | 1124 -26% | 1585 4% | 823 -46% | |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 97 | 99 2% | 98 1% | 95 -2% | 97 0% | |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.4 -0% | 1.7 -21% | 1.9 -36% | 1.9 -36% | 1 29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.9 | 2.3 21% | 2.5 14% | 3.5 -21% | 4.3 -48% | 1.8 38% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 1.6 24% | 1.4 33% | 1.6 24% | 2.9 -38% | 1.4 33% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.23 99% | 2.08 106% | 2.28 96% | 2.27 97% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 6832 95% | 6715 97% | 6578 99% | 6721 97% | 7083 92% | 6544 99% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 34% / 25% | 2% / -2% | 28% / 9% | 1% / -5% | -15% / -9% |
* ... smaller is better
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz Amplitude: 14.46 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7619 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Measurement series with a fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (Although the amplitude curve at minimum brightness appears flat, this is due to the scaling. The info box shows a magnified version of the amplitude at minimum brightness.)
The display’s color settings can be extensively customized to suit your needs. We achieved the most natural result using “Original Mode.”
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.93 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.493 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.4355 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.93 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.435 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.496 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms). | ||
Outdoors, the increased brightness is a definite plus. The Xperia 10 VIII is now easier to read even in direct sunlight.
The viewing angle stability is good, and there is never any color distortion. However, a shimmering color haze appears over the image at very shallow viewing angles.
The Sony Xperia 10 VIII once again runs on the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3. Given the price range this smartphone now falls into, we find this to be somewhat underpowered. The competition generally has more to offer in this regard.
In everyday use, the system stutters from time to time.
| Geekbench 7.0 | |
| Single-Core | |
| Average of class Smartphone (514 - 3156, n=38, last 2 years) | 1542 Points +81% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 1222 Points +43% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288 | 1174 Points +37% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, Adreno 812, 8192 | 902 Points +6% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 854 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (n=1) | 854 Points 0% |
| Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1368 - 10953, n=38, last 2 years) | 5423 Points +82% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 4470 Points +50% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288 | 4244 Points +43% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 2974 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (n=1) | 2974 Points 0% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, Adreno 812, 8192 | 2846 Points -4% |
| Geekbench 6.7 | |
| Single-Core | |
| Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3759, n=189, last 2 years) | 1860 Points +94% |
| Google Pixel 10a Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192 | 1682 Points +76% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 1378 Points +44% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288 | 1320 Points +38% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, Adreno 812, 8192 | 1038 Points +8% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (957 - 1033, n=6) | 1007 Points +5% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 999 Points +4% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 957 Points |
| Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Smartphone (830 - 12298, n=189, last 2 years) | 5654 Points +98% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 4509 Points +58% |
| Google Pixel 10a Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192 | 4309 Points +51% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288 | 4188 Points +47% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, Adreno 812, 8192 | 3202 Points +12% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 2943 Points +3% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (2853 - 2963, n=6) | 2927 Points +3% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 2853 Points |
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.x | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 15108 Points +57% |
| Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=133, last 2 years) | 15063 Points +57% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288 | 13332 Points +39% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, Adreno 812, 8192 | 12193 Points +27% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (9617 - 13807, n=5) | 11490 Points +19% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 10086 Points +5% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 9617 Points |
| Antutu v11 - Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (519159 - 4450644, n=44, last 2 years) | 2424621 Points +176% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 1414040 Points +61% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, Adreno 812, 8192 | 935592 Points +6% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 885038 Points +1% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 879035 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (857561 - 885038, n=3) | 873878 Points -1% |
| CrossMark - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (376 - 2856, n=106, last 2 years) | 1267 Points |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288 | 1081 Points |
| Google Pixel 10a Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192 | 1008 Points |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 851 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (737 - 877, n=4) | 813 Points |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | Points |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, Adreno 812, 8192 | Points |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | Points |
| BaseMark OS II | |
| Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=112, last 2 years) | 8115 Points +68% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 6737 Points +40% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288 | 6171 Points +28% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, Adreno 812, 8192 | 5248 Points +9% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 5056 Points +5% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 4821 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4532 - 5056, n=5) | 4785 Points -1% |
| System | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=112, last 2 years) | 11724 Points +24% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 10270 Points +8% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 9674 Points +2% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 9489 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (8445 - 9674, n=5) | 9118 Points -4% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288 | 8503 Points -10% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, Adreno 812, 8192 | 8057 Points -15% |
| Memory | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=112, last 2 years) | 9607 Points +89% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 8343 Points +64% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288 | 6739 Points +33% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, Adreno 812, 8192 | 5902 Points +16% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 5876 Points +16% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4554 - 6102, n=5) | 5248 Points +3% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 5078 Points |
| Graphics | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 61797, n=112, last 2 years) | 25395 Points +228% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288 | 17705 Points +129% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 13352 Points +73% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, Adreno 812, 8192 | 10710 Points +39% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 7732 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (7298 - 8011, n=5) | 7615 Points -2% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 7559 Points -2% |
| Web | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 1801 Points +24% |
| Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=112, last 2 years) | 1756 Points +21% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 1498 Points +3% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, Adreno 812, 8192 | 1490 Points +3% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (1425 - 1498, n=5) | 1463 Points +1% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 1450 Points |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288 | 1430 Points -1% |
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2895 - 66164, n=99, last 2 years) | 18908 Points +98% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 11868 Points +24% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 9538 Points |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 9276 Points -3% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (8253 - 9538, n=5) | 9036 Points -5% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, Adreno 812, 8192 | 8935 Points -6% |
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision NPU 1.7 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (80 - 4471, n=132, last 2 years) | 496 Points +259% |
| Google Pixel 10a Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192 | 386 Points +180% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 284 Points +106% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288 | 276 Points +100% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, Adreno 812, 8192 | 147 Points +7% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 138 Points 0% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 138 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (123 - 138, n=4) | 134 Points -3% |
| Half Precision NPU 1.7 | |
| Google Pixel 10a Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192 | 4973 Points +3504% |
| Average of class Smartphone (80 - 35139, n=132, last 2 years) | 1377 Points +898% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 284 Points +106% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288 | 276 Points +100% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, Adreno 812, 8192 | 150 Points +9% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 141 Points +2% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 138 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (123 - 141, n=4) | 135 Points -2% |
| Quantized NPU 1.7 | |
| Google Pixel 10a Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192 | 9392 Points +2314% |
| Average of class Smartphone (124 - 48271, n=132, last 2 years) | 2177 Points +460% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 637 Points +64% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB, Adreno 722, 12288 | 635 Points +63% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, Adreno 812, 8192 | 424 Points +9% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 398 Points +2% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 389 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (351 - 398, n=4) | 383 Points -2% |
| AI Benchmark | |
| Score V5 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=18, last 2 years) | 371 Points |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680, Xclipse 550, 8192 | 128 Points |
| Score V6 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=79, last 2 years) | 6280 Points +203% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192 | 2074 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (299 - 2074, n=3) | 921 Points -56% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, Adreno 812, 8192 | Points -100% |
The Adreno 710 GPU in the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 does not support ray tracing. It is suitable for simple games but quickly reaches its limits with demanding titles.
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 2660 Points +210% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 2063 Points +140% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 1718 Points +100% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Adreno 812, SD 6 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 1162 Points +35% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 881 Points +3% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 859 Points |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 2695 Points +211% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 2094 Points +142% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 1721 Points +99% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Adreno 812, SD 6 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash (Press-Version) | 1200 Points +38% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Adreno 812, SD 6 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash (Play-Store-Version) | 1196 Points +38% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 876 Points +1% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 867 Points |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 9702 Points +192% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 7722 Points +133% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6154 Points +85% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Adreno 812, SD 6 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 4613 Points +39% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 3318 Points |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 3295 Points -1% |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 7589 Points +131% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 5937 Points +80% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Adreno 812, SD 6 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 4295 Points +31% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 3298 Points 0% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Press-Version) | 3290 Points |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (Play-Store-Version) | 3289 Points 0% |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
| Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 1104 Points +260% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 784 Points +155% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 773 Points +152% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Adreno 812, SD 6 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 422 Points +37% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 307 Points |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 306 Points 0% |
| 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
| Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 1091 Points +258% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 774 Points +154% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 772 Points +153% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Adreno 812, SD 6 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 415 Points +36% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 309 Points +1% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 305 Points |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 60 fps +150% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 43 fps +79% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 24 fps |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 23 fps -4% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Adreno 812, SD 6 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 23 fps -4% |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 91 fps +203% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 49 fps +63% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Adreno 812, SD 6 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 38 fps +27% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 30 fps |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 29 fps -3% |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 59 fps +181% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 43 fps +105% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 41 fps +95% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Adreno 812, SD 6 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 23 fps +10% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 21 fps |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 19 fps -10% |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 44 fps +193% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 36 fps +140% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 34 fps +127% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Adreno 812, SD 6 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 22 fps +47% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 15 fps |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 14 fps -7% |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 67 fps +116% |
| Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 60 fps +94% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 57 fps +84% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Adreno 812, SD 6 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 36 fps +16% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 31 fps |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 30 fps -3% |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 120 fps +186% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 98 fps +133% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 72 fps +71% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Adreno 812, SD 6 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 57 fps +36% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 42 fps |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 38 fps -10% |
| GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 20 fps +208% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 16 fps +146% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 14 fps +115% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Adreno 812, SD 6 Gen 5, 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 9.4 fps +45% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.5 fps |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash (es3.1) | 6.4 fps -2% |
| Jetstream 2 | |
| 2.0 Total | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro (Chrome 147) | 203.079 Points +86% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149) | 178.3 Points +64% |
| Average of class Smartphone (63.9 - 423, n=115, last 2 years) | 157.7 Points +45% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G (Chrome 153) | 149.635 Points +37% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (109 - 147.8, n=5) | 126.4 Points +16% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII (Chrome 153) | 109.02 Points |
| 2.2 Total | |
| Google Pixel 10a (Chrome 149) | 222.755 Points +59% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro (Chrome 147) | 208.203 Points +48% |
| Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=103, last 2 years) | 204 Points +45% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149) | 203.905 Points +45% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G (Chrome 153) | 159.238 Points +13% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII (Chrome 153) | 140.531 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (122 - 149.4, n=5) | 135.2 Points -4% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII (Chrome 143) | 123.568 Points -12% |
| WebXPRT 5 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 104, n=26, last 2 years) | 51.8 Points +48% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149) | 48 Points +37% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G (Chrome 153) | 37 Points +6% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII (Chrome 153) | 35 Points |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (n=1) | 35 Points 0% |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149) | 55771 Points +45% |
| Average of class Smartphone (6015 - 126661, n=135, last 2 years) | 50757 Points +32% |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G (Chrome 153) | 39620 Points +3% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (37483 - 40500, n=5) | 38474 Points 0% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII (Chrome 153) | 38422 Points |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII (Chrome 143) | 37865 Points -1% |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII (Chrome 143) | 1476.1 ms * -47% |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (978 - 1476, n=5) | 1114 ms * -11% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII (Chrome 153) | 1007.3 ms * |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G (Chrome 153) | 981.5 ms * +3% |
| Average of class Smartphone (281 - 2718, n=119, last 2 years) | 851 ms * +16% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 (Chrome 149) | 776.8 ms * +23% |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII | Google Pixel 10a | Samsung Galaxy A57 | Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | Sony Xperia 10 VII | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -13% | -33% | 17% | -27% | -33% | 5% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 1914.56 | 1689.27 -12% | 1683.07 -12% | 1977.37 3% | 1022.21 -47% | 1588 ?(529 - 3134, n=76) -17% | 2280 ?(270 - 4370, n=179, last 2 years) 19% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 1802.32 | 826.38 -54% | 1119.11 -38% | 1738.18 -4% | 973.41 -46% | 820 ?(233 - 1853, n=76) -55% | 1972 ?(152.2 - 4113, n=179, last 2 years) 9% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 320.27 | 326.53 2% | 249.83 -22% | 409.28 28% | 298.75 -7% | 247 ?(126.2 - 428, n=76) -23% | 317 ?(47.6 - 614, n=179, last 2 years) -1% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 386.88 | 430.37 11% | 149.04 -61% | 547.62 42% | 354.89 -8% | 251 ?(61.8 - 503, n=76) -35% | 362 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=179, last 2 years) -6% |
The surface temperatures of the Xperia 10 VIII can get quite high under sustained load, but they remain within a safe range. However, the SoC — which isn’t particularly fast to begin with — throttles a bit even then.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 45.4 °C = 114 F Average: 41.4 °C = 107 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 47.6 °C = 118 F Average: 42.3 °C = 108 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 99.8 % +25% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 99.5 % +24% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 90.3 % +13% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 80.1 % |
| Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 66.4 % -17% |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 99.6 % +32% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 97.7 % +29% |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 93.4 % +23% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 75.7 % |
| Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 68.7 % -9% |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 99.2 % +15% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 99.1 % +15% |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Adreno 722, SD 7 Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 98.2 % +14% |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 86 % |
| Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 76.9 % -11% |
Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø4.35 (4-5.28) %
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø10.2 (9.65-10.3) %
Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø12.7 (11-16) %
Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.1 (16-20) %
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø35.6 (33-36.5) %
Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø45.8 (37.9-57.1) %
Sony Xperia 10 VIII Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø2.16 (1.978-2.3) %
Samsung Galaxy A57 Xclipse 550, Exynos 1680, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø5.72 (5.69-5.73) %
Google Pixel 10a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø7.02 (6.23-8.1) %
The two front-facing speakers still deliver decent sound even at higher volumes, though the sound lacks a bit of depth. At maximum volume, however, they tend to distort.
Sound output is better via the 3.5 mm jack, which only achieves an average SNR of 49.18 dBFS in testing, but this applies only to a very narrow frequency range.
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 136%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
The Xperia 10 VIII's power consumption is somewhat high at full display brightness but is otherwise unremarkable.
We fully recharged the 5,000 mAh battery in 69 minutes using a Ugreen Nexode 65 W power adapter.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII 5000 mAh | Google Pixel 10a 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A57 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G mAh | Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 5080 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 VII 5000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 46% | -4% | -3% | 11% | 23% | 10% | 1% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.81 | 0.7 14% | 0.71 12% | 1.3 -60% | 1.01 -25% | 0.85 -5% | 0.893 ?(0.8 - 1.04, n=6) -10% | 0.901 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=137, last 2 years) -11% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 2.51 | 0.94 63% | 1.94 23% | 2.12 16% | 1.78 29% | 1.11 56% | 1.507 ?(1.1 - 2.51, n=6) 40% | 1.483 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=137, last 2 years) 41% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2.57 | 1.03 60% | 2.04 21% | 2.18 15% | 1.81 30% | 1.17 54% | 1.618 ?(1.17 - 2.57, n=6) 37% | 1.677 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=137, last 2 years) 35% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 4.37 | 6.19 -42% | 4.37 -0% | 4.32 1% | 5.35 ?(4.05 - 8.7, n=5) -22% | 6.82 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=89, last 2 years) -56% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 10.16 | 13.67 -35% | 8.7 14% | 9.09 11% | 9.86 ?(8.98 - 11, n=5) 3% | 10.8 ?(4.75 - 22, n=89, last 2 years) -6% |
* ... smaller is better
Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.85 (0.994-8.92) Watt
Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.06 (1.031-9.16) Watt
Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.211 (1.161-1.353) Watt
Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.949 (0.915-1.153) Watt
Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.66 (4.32-5.51) Watt
Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.68 (4.34-4.93) Watt
Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.211 (1.161-1.353) Watt
Sony Xperia 10 VII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.949 (0.915-1.153) Watt
In our standardized Wi-Fi browsing test at 150 nits, the Sony Xperia 10 VIII’s battery life reached nearly 20 hours. That’s a good result, but surprisingly worse than that of its predecessor.
Battery Runtime
| WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 153) | 19h 50min | |
| Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII 5000 mAh | 19.8 h |
| Google Pixel 10a 5100 mAh | 20 h |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 5000 mAh | 14.9 h |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro 5080 mAh | 18 h |
| Sony Xperia 10 VII 5000 mAh | 23.9 h |
The Sony Xperia 10 VIII impresses with its bright OLED display, good battery life, and rare extras. But given its high price and the few improvements over its predecessor, it offers too little in the way of progress.
Sony Xperia 10 VIII
- 09/25/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Chassis
87%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
53 / 69 → 77%
Weight
92 / 50-100 → 84%
Battery
92%
Display
90%
Games Performance
12 / 55 → 21%
Application Performance
59 / 85 → 70%
AI Performance
10%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Camera
66%
Average
67%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
95%
Power Use
92.8%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
89%
Total Sustainability Score: 61.1%
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sony Xperia 10 VIII Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 599€ | 168 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.10" 2340x1080 422 PPI OLED | |
| Google Pixel 10a Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 549€ | 183 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.30" 2424x1080 421 PPI pOLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy A57 Samsung Exynos 1680 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 550 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 589€ | 179 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.70" 2340x1080 385 PPI Super AMOLED | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro Max 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 812 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x | List Price: 600€ | 225 g | 256 GB UFS 4.1 Flash | 6.83" 2772x1280 447 PPI | |
| Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 SM7750-AB ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 722 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 549€ | 210 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.83" 2800x1260 450 PPI AMOLED |
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Editor of the original article: Daniel Schmidt - Managing Editor Mobile - 1057 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013
As a child I was fascinated by my Commodore 16, and this sparked my enthusiasm for computers. Using my first modem, I surfed the BTX videotext system and later the World Wide Web. I have always been captivated by the latest technologies, and this is especially true for mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets. I’ve been part of the Notebookcheck team since 2013 and have also on occasion written for Notebookinfo.de, and I’m looking forward to testing new innovations for our readers. I like to spend my spare time indulging in photography and barbecues and being with my family.
Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 859257 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
My main responsibility as an editorial assistant is maintaining the Library section, which aggregates reviews from other publications and channels. In addition, my daily breakfast is Notebookcheck's long list of new content, which I comb through to select the most interesting topics for translation from English to French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch."
Daniel Schmidt, 2026-09-28 (Update: 2026-09-28)
| # | Наименование новости | Тональность | Информативность | Дата публикации |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | This plus is a minus, except for the battery – Motorola Edge 70 Plus smartphone review | 0 | 11.49 | 01-10-2026 |
| 2 | Road warrior with compromises - Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Gen 7 AMD Laptop Review | 0 | 9.55 | 29-09-2026 |
| 3 | Lightweight ANC in-ear headphones with LDAC and Spatial Audio - Huawei FreeBuds Neo review | 0 | 7.75 | 02-10-2026 |
| 4 | Moto Razr Fold Review: The Folding Phone That Puts Samsung On Notice | 0 | 7.27 | 14-05-2026 |
| 5 | Snapdragon chip prices are officially going up, maybe by ‘double digits’ [U] | 0 | 23.94 | 30-07-2026 |
| 6 | Обзор POCO X8: народный смартфон за разумные деньги и без слабых мест. Убедился сам | 0 | 6.14 | 25-09-2026 |
| 7 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 And Fold8 Ultra Review: A Wide Winning Formula | 0 | 15.06 | 14-08-2026 |
| 8 | HONOR X5ds è lo smartphone economico con un display sul retro | 0 | 18.51 | 05-10-2026 |
| 9 | After the excitement wears off, iPhone Duo’s limitations remain | 0 | 13.28 | 10-09-2026 |